Hand-held digital cameras are quietly working a profound revolution on the way that professional researchers and academic historians are today conducting research in archives. A new era for researchers has begun – one that has the digital camera replacing in part the taking of notes by pencil, photocopy, microform, or computer. Except in cases where a researcher has the luxury of conducting research in their hometown, the days of sitting in a repository day-after-day, reading each document while writing pencil notes became obsolete years ago with the appearance of photocopying and microform reproduction. Most libraries and archives today willingly provide photocopy services for their patrons.
The appearance of the portable laptop several decades ago also had an impact on conducting research in historical libraries and archives. Although as late as the 1990s a few archivists prohibited laptops in their reading rooms, such prohibitions are now virtually unknown. Today, all archives willingly permit researchers to use laptops. Digital cameras, no doubt, will eventually be as ubiquitous in all archives as photocopying and the use of laptops. Archival policy on the use of digital cameras however constitutes a new technological frontier for libraries and archives. This is especially so for those facilities that have collections of broad interest to the scholarly community because of extensive paper collections constituting discreet, one-of-a kind holdings.
From the viewpoint of the researcher, one reason compelling use of the digital camera is that travel to the regionally and nationally significant archives can be a financial burden. The digital camera can greatly speed research and thereby reduce travel, hotel, and per diem expenses. From the archival viewpoint, taking a digital image exponentially limits the potential for damage to documents sometimes caused by photocopying, scanning, or microfilming. Making a digital image of a document laid flat on the table is no more destructive than a researcher reading it with their own eyes.
The use of a digital camera, of course, does not eliminate the taking of paper notes as most researchers will still do that too. Indeed, the use of paper was not eliminated by photocopying or the laptop. Yet, like these now universally accepted technological advances, the digital camera constitutes an important, timely way to increase the efficiency of archival research. Personally, I have been using a hand held digital camera for almost two years in conducting my archival research. Over that time, the technology has vastly improved. I started with an HP Photosmart 950, which seemed ultramodern several years ago. Today, I have several models of the Nikon Coolpix, which is about the size of a deck of playing cards and has a document setting. I do not have any particular recommendation for a camera since there are numerous models that can do the job, with most of them priced in the one hundred dollar range. Once I return home, I download my images and convert them into .pdf format files that become part of a database that constitutes the foundation of my research plan. I have visited almost 50 archives, large and small, over the last two years without ever having an archivist refuse me the use of my digital camera whenever I asked, although in some cases I was the first researcher make such a request and thus had to explain what I wanted to do. I am greatly reassured because more and more archival repositories now have written policies outlining the use of digital cameras.
These policies protect both archival holdings from exploitation and also meet the needs of the researcher. I consider it a mark of professionalism when an archivist hands me a written copy of their digital camera policy for my guidance in the reading room. Randomly selected, here are links to digital camera policies at Harvard’s
Houghton Library and the
Newberry Library. Archival policies regarding use of digital cameras often have some or all of the following components: (1) Researchers may not use flash, (2) Documents cannot be raised, moved off the table, or otherwise placed in positions other than in the manner a researcher would be normally be reading them, (3) Researchers provide the archive with a list of what has been copied with the digital camera, (4) Images can be used only for individual study purposes as a part of scholarly research in the same manner that the rights to publication remain with the archive in the case of photocopy or microform made by the archive, (5) No collection can be copied in its entirely, and (6) Images made by the researcher cannot be placed in any other archive, library, or repository – or put on the internet -- without the advance permission of the facility where the researcher took the image. Many repositories do permit the researcher to use images taken on their premises in non-commercial Power Points for educational purposes as long as attribution credit is given. Last week, I spent several days in the Archives and Special Collections of the Noel Memorial Library at Louisiana State University – Shreveport. I was impressed with their digital camera policy. With the permission of Dr. Laura McLemore, Director of Archives and Special Collections, I reproduce below that written policy, which I captured with a digital camera.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c9cf/6c9cff66afe1da2fe50fe8eef160ac357af04d76" alt=""